Actual Freedom – Mailing List ‘D’ Correspondence

Richard’s Correspondence On Mailing List ‘D’

with Correspondent No. 5

Continued from Mailing List ‘B’: Sock Puppet ‘S’ and from Mailing List ‘AF’: Sock Puppet ‘N’ / Sock Puppet ‘C’ / Sock Puppet ‘X’ / Sock Puppet ‘R’

June 13 2013

Re: benevolence and benignity

RESPONDENT (Sock Puppet ‘H’): ok. nobody is writing anything here without a motive.

correct me if wrong about that and why. and these motives whether agreed on or not, imagined or not, misinterpreted or not, understood or not, denied or not, are taking up huge percentages of reading and writing time here. IOW just laborious pages spend on just finding out what each other meant (by such and such) and why it was presented.

with that in mind i have a very simple question; what is the beneficial motive, the 100% harmless, benevolent and benign motive, behind exposing peoples anonyms/ pseudonyms/ aliases etc on the internet?

RICHARD: Simple: ‘falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus’.

Regards, Richard.

June 28 2013

Re: Power, dominance hierarchy, control of narrative

RESPONDENT No. 4: By now it’s pretty much crossed into the realm of comedy for me. (I mean, I’ve seen plenty of intelligence and good will and clarity of mind – and I don’t mean it in the bleeding heart compassion / sympathy sense either – from everyone but Richard). [...].

RESPONDENT: [...] WFAC [No. 6] based her allegations on what Richard himself had told her while in India (regarding the force he’d used on his ex-partner to ‘bring her to her sense’ (far from baseless) .

RICHARD: G’day No. 5, You were given ample opportunity, in post after post, late last year/ earlier this year to provide [quote] ‘those reports’ [end quote] – whereupon I would indeed address them as demanded so emphatically by you – and the fact remains that you did not provide them/ have not provided them to this very day (nigh-on six months later).


The following is the essential section of my initial post.


From: richard.actualfreedom
Date: Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:57 am
Subject: Re: it is impossible to marry Actualism and Buddhism

• [Respondent No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: [...]. cut the crap and address those reports NOW! to wit: ‘that youre a perverted woman bashing ...

• [Richard]: I am stopping you right there solely for the sake of demonstrating something you have quite evidentially overlooked ... namely: there are no [quote] ‘reports’ [endquote] to the effect of me being a woman-basher (let alone a ‘perverted’ one).
So, here is your opportunity before you go on and make it even worse for yourself than you already have: if you can produce those so-called reports of [quote] ‘woman bashing’ [endquote] then I will indeed address them, as demanded so emphatically by you, and ... um ... then ‘get tapping NOW!’.
Note well, this is a one-off opportunity because, as I enunciated unambiguously in Message No. 11315, there is no way I am going to rebut/ refute each and every one of all that made-up stuff about a phantom ‘Richard’ who has no existence outside of passionate imagination.
Vis.: [...snip...].
Lastly, if you do not produce those so-called reports of [quote] ‘woman bashing’ [endquote] then by not doing so you are tacitly admitting, to all and sundry, they do not exist.
So, here is your one-off opportunity ... and you would be well-advised to not waste it.
Regards, Richard.

Please delete your further above message (#14577) and re-post it sans that maligning, libelling and defaming sentence.

Thanking you in advance,

Regards, Richard.

July 1 2013

Re: Upcoming visit

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: heh heh heh here we go again :D more popcorn anyone? research ‘playing one person against another’ [... snip ...].

RESPONDENT No. 37 (Sock-Puppet ‘I’)]: Richard tries to make sure that the person who is about to visit him [... snip ...].

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: coz there’s a lot at stake! he’s attempting to [... snip ...].

RICHARD: Hmm ... I can always tell some traction is being gained when the conjoined twins Heckle & Jeckle revert to their tacky tag-team tactics in their bizzarro-land attempts to prevent a few felicitous and innocuous peoples from having their happy and harmless way of being become a world-wide trend (and thereby usher in global peace and harmony in our lifetimes).

Ha ... instead of a melodrama their cyber-space ‘Bash Richard/Trash Actualism’ RPG is more reminiscent of The Ringling Bros Three-Ring Circus than anything else.

‘Roll up! Roll up! Roll up, folks! Roll up for the ... um ... for The Bragg Bros All-Bling Side Show! Starring none other than ... The Kiwi Klowns!’

‘Yes, folks, appearing Exclusively Here, daily, for your On-line Entertainment is ... (drum-roll please maestro) ... ‘The Lads from The Land of the Long White Cloud’ (whose main trait held in common, apart from the same progenitor, is an entrenched resistance to the advent of peace-on-earth) who will Thrill You! Chill You! Drill You!
with their Mind-Bending Boondoggle!
with their Ludicrous Legerdemain!
with their Prurient Pastiche!
with their Salacious Slapstick!
with their Shabby Shape-Shifting!’

The Kiwi Klowns! See them Bumbling! Stumbling! Tumbling! ... before Your Very Eyes! ... of the likes Never Seen Before!

July 1 2013

Re: Upcoming visit

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: heh heh heh here we go again :D more popcorn anyone? research ‘playing one person against another’ [... snip ...].

RESPONDENT No. 37 (Sock-Puppet ‘I’)]: Richard tries to make sure that the person who is about to visit him [... snip ...].

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: coz there’s a lot at stake! he’s attempting to [... snip ...].

RICHARD: Hmm ... I can always tell some traction is being gained when the conjoined twins Heckle & Jeckle revert to their tacky tag-team tactics [...].

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: oooh oooh maybe i will be back this evening, didnt catch this call hehehe

RICHARD: Wow ... now that is indeed dedication to your self-promotional (don’t-listen-to-him!/ listen-to-me-instead!) piggy-backed-on-the-enterprise-of-another crusade ... especially given that only five minutes prior you had declared to all and sundry that [quote] ‘it is now wayyyy too glorious to spend one moment more behind winter walls. 10 days of relentless rain have finally ended and a lush green Sydney glistens invitingly under a bright blue sky. outta here’ [endquote].

In regards to your puffed-up-with-self-importance ‘didnt catch this call’ freudian slip: please be advised that it was *not* a call but parodic humour (quite evidentially designed for comic effect) and nothing else.

(It is patently obvious that the ... um ... The Bragg Bros are lacking a sense of humour – such that enables one to laugh at oneself – but surely it would be of a utilitarian value for your many personae to pretend you do have one).

Be that as it may; in view of your (needlessly) announced early return – being made specifically on account of this throwaway post – here is a more fleshed-out version, deliberately edited for comic effect of course, of that further above truncated depiction of Heckle & Jeckle for you to get some practice in (at pretending to find something self-parodic humorous) so as to plug that glaring leak which shows up in all your internet aliases.


Heckle and Jeckle: Heckle and Jeckle are postwar animated cartoon characters created by Paul Terry, originally produced at his own Terrytoons animation studio and released through 20th Century Fox ...’.

Who’s who: Although identical in appearance, they are differentiated by their voices (...). However, the two magpies are far more alike in temperament than they are different ...’.

Characteristics: While both are basically brash, cynical and antagonistic, Heckle may be more openly confrontational, and Jeckle slightly more devious. Both may deliberately annoy their mutual foils with insults, slapstick violence and rudeness, but Heckle is more likely to make his intentions clear from the outset. Conversely, Jeckle often treats enemies politely at first, in order to lull them into a false sense of security before unleashing magpie mayhem. They are alternately cast as a pair of conmen actively out to swindle an unsuspecting dupe – or just freeloading opportunists ...’.

The high point of any Heckle and Jeckle cartoon was arguably the climactic chase sequence (...). Heckle and Jeckle often received their comeuppance before the fadeout, however, as they were usually the instigators of the conflict in the first place. Although they’ve wound up inside a jail cell on occasion ...’. (

July 2 2013

Re: Power, dominance hierarchy, control of narrative

RICHARD to No. 25: [...] this totally new way of being conscious (a completely original consciousness) can only have a global spread, in our life-times, if it be implemented via happy and harmless (affective) ‘vibes’ and felicitous and innocuous (psychic) ‘currents’, eh?

RESPONDENT No. 17: Would it be possible to have this global spread online as we can’t all make it to Australia?

RICHARD: You raise two points there which can only be answered by mentioning the third point you left unspoken. [...snip...].

Third (the point you left unspoken): there already exists a world-wide network – requiring neither technological wizz-bangs nor competency in the English language – which has a truly global reach (inherently connecting every single man, woman and child alive today no matter what their age) and is instantaneous in its effect.

And, most importantly, it is where the real power-play takes place anyway – given that it by-passes both the cognitive and the affective filters – as it operation has the immediacy of ‘being’ to ‘being’ (‘me’ at the core of ‘my’ being is ‘being’ itself) directivity.

RESPONDENT No. 17: What would it take?

RICHARD: Ha ... enjoying *and* appreciating being alive/ being here, each moment again come what may, by being as happy and as harmless as is humanly possible via minimising both the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’ feelings and maximising both the felicitous *and* the innocuous feelings.

Put simplistically (for maximum effect): the way to bring about global peace and harmony, in our lifetimes, is by having fun. (I am having such a ball here at the keyboard).

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: if you tried rattled on like this on a TED Talk ..

RICHARD: The following items took about 4 minutes to locate via an internet search.


TED (which stands for ‘Technology, Entertainment, Design’) was founded in 1984 by the architect Richard Saul Wurman and his partners. Their first conference included one of the first demonstrations of the Macintosh computer. In 2001, TED was acquired and is now run by Chris Anderson, the new-media entrepreneur who started Business 2.0, among other magazines and Web sites. Giving a TED talk has become an opportunity for name-in-lights speakers to throw down, set forth ‘ideas worth spreading’ and prove their intellectual heroism. (


TED started out (in 1984) as a conference bringing together people from three worlds: Technology, Entertainment, Design. (

TED is owned by The Sapling Foundation, a private nonprofit foundation, a 501(c)3 organization under US tax code. It was established in 1996 by Chris Anderson, who was at that time a magazine publishing entrepreneur. The goal of the foundation is to foster the spread of great ideas. It aims to provide a platform for the world’s smartest thinkers, greatest visionaries and most inspiring teachers (...). Ever since The Sapling Foundation acquired TED (in November 2001), it has been seeking ways to allow the extraordinary passion and inspiration created every year at our conferences in California and the UK to effect beneficial change in the world. (

If anything, my (experiential) expertise may very well be slotted into the academic category/ discipline known as ‘Consciousness Studies’ and *not* what is designated above as ‘Technology, Entertainment, Design’.

Golly, I specifically say [quote] ‘requiring neither *technological* wizz-bangs nor competency in the English language’ [emphasis added] and yet what immediately pops into your mind is an image of your phantom ‘Richard’ rattling on at a ... a ‘TED Talk’ ... of all things?

Moreover, I am neither a ‘name-in-lights speaker’ intending to prove my ‘intellectual heroism’ nor a ‘thinker’ and/or a ‘visionary’ and/or a ‘teacher’ (be it one of the ‘smartest’ and/or the ‘greatest’ and/or the ‘most inspiring’ kind or any other variety) and never, ever will be.

For instance:

• [Richard]: ‘I am a fellow human being (albeit sans identity/ affections in toto) providing a report of what I have discovered and not some latter-day ‘teacher’ (aka sage or seer, god-man or guru, master or messiah, saviour or saint, and so on) with yet another bodiless ‘teaching’. (Actual Freedom Mailing List, No. 53a, 28 October 2003).

• [Richard]: ‘I have no ambitions whatsoever to be anything other than what I am now; I thoroughly enjoy my current life-style, as it is, totally, completely, utterly. I fully enjoy my own company; I fully enjoy the company of a choice companion; I fully enjoy the company of select associates ... this is the life-style I have chosen; this is the lifestyle I wish to live; this is the lifestyle I am living.
I enjoy normal things: I live in a normal suburban duplex; I eat at normal restaurants; I meet normal people at cafés; I chat about normal things; I have normal pastimes ... to be able to freely live this normal lifestyle in a seaside village is why I set out to become free of the human condition all those years ago.
I never intended – and I do not intend – to become some sort of latter-day atheistic-saviour of humankind wherein I cannot live a normal lifestyle’. (Actual Freedom Mailing List,  No. 32, 10 May 2002).

• [Richard]: ‘I set my sights further than being a mere saviour of humankind, all those years ago when I was determined to be free of the human condition, and I am not likely to fall back into that position now that I have succeeded’. (List B, No. 34a, 8 June 1999).

• [Richard]: ‘I also say (repeatedly) that I set my sights further than merely being (yet again) another of the long list of failed Messiahs and Masters, Gurus and God-Men, Saints and Sages, Avatars and Saviours and that I am not likely to fall back into that position now that I am free from the human condition’. (List B, No. 25e, 13 October 1999).

• [Richard]: ‘I set my sights further than being yet another embodiment of that ‘supreme intelligence’ all those years ago, when I first began my journey into ‘my’ psyche (which is the ‘human’ psyche), so I am not likely to fall back into that position now’. (List B, No. 40, 3 October 1999).

And, whilst at it, I may as well nip in the bud an as yet nascent meme, currently peeking coyly out from where it presently lies buried, amidst a whole mess of pottage, but surely about to soon burst forth into full bloom in follow-up posts of similar ilk.


• [Richard]: ‘(...) what I share with my fellow human, being experiential, is not at all scientifical ...’. (Actual Freedom Mailing List, No. 74f, 11 February 2006).

• [Richard]: ‘This is an apt place to point out, right up-front and out-in-the open, that what I have to report/ describe/ explain is experiential and not scientifical’. (Actual Freedom Mailing List, No. 116, 13 May 2006).

• [Richard]: ‘Moreover, as I am an actualist, and not a scientist, my reports/ descriptions/ explanations are experiential, not scientifical ...’. (Actual Freedom Mailing List, No. 78a, 12 December 2004).

• [Richard]: ‘Oh? Yet another person insisting I be a laboratory guinea-pig for them (even though I say again and again that actualism is experiential and not scientifical), eh?’ (Actual Freedom Mailing List, No. 78b, 5 January 2005a).

• [Richard]: ‘I mention this because actualism, being experiential, is not a matter for science ... nor are my reports/ descriptions/ explanations scientifical’. (Actual Freedom Mailing List, No. 89c, 10 September 2005).

Now, having headed that off at the pass ... back to the latest of your ever-changing theses (per favour either ‘YouTube’ or the ‘BBC’) on how to preserve the status-quo.

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: ... then finished off with this corny ending...

RICHARD: Hmm ... so, in your world, enjoying *and* appreciating being alive/being here, each moment again come what may (by being as happy and as harmless as is humanly possible via minimising both the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’ feelings and maximising both the felicitous *and* the innocuous feelings), such as to bring about global peace and harmony in our lifetimes by having fun, just like the ball I am having here at the keyboard, is [quote] ‘corny’ [endquote].

Well well well ... who woulda guessed it, eh?

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: ... they’d think you were majorly cracked.

RICHARD: Ha ... so now you have taken it upon yourself to speak on behalf of the world’s smartest thinkers, greatest visionaries and most inspiring teachers (not to forget those name-in-lights speakers throwing down/setting forth ideas-worth-spreading so as to prove their intellectual heroism) and yet the best you could come up with was ... ‘majorly cracked’?

Just what is it, oh marplot, that you have against having fun?

Regards, Richard.

July 3 2013

Re: Upcoming visit

RESPONDENT No. 25: Also, he did a very strange thing when I was there the first time. He stated that ‘unless I were to become free’ on that trip – then it was ‘pointless’ to have made the trip – which I found very bizarre.

RESPONDENT No. 37 (Sock-Puppet ‘I’)]: You might have found that very bizarre but then what Justine has stated about Richard asking her daughter to lie about being free doesn’t seem that far fetched.

RESPONDENT No. 29: Justine never said that. You seem to have mixed up points 9 and 10 in his farewell mail. Read it Again.

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: here it is:

[Justine]: 10) In fact, after meeting him, she was worried that Mr. Richard suggested to her, that lying for one’s own convenience is fully allowed. That very minute she has discarded actualism.

RESPONDENT No. 29: Yes. [No. 37] was suggesting that Richard had told the daughter to lie about being free. Which is not the same as the point 10. It’s just about lying and without any context... One can’t say what it’s about. She might have felt moralistic about any sort of lies. It’s definitely not the same as [No. 37] suggests.

RESPONDENT No. 5 (Sock-Puppet ‘H’)]: it doesnt matter what its about, lying is lying, and thats not exemplary behaviour, not by a long shot

RICHARD: And that, oh bling-crafter extraordinaire, is a herring so ruddy in its lambency your devious divagation has stood uncorrected all this while (until now of course).


• [Co-Respondent]: Richard, have you ever lied to anyone on this mailing list?

• [Richard]: No ... you may find the following to be of related interest:

• [Co-Respondent]: ‘Richard, I think it is possible for you to lie, is it not?’
• [Richard]: ‘As you have titled this e-mail ‘Sincerity’ there could be more to this question than the pragmatic fact that, given the human condition is endemic, it is sometimes necessary on occasion to not provide a truthful answer to an adversarial person or persons in a position of power who, bent on dominance, will not listen to reason. Even so, I cannot recall any instance over the last x-number of years that I have had to have recourse to lying ... having nothing to hide there has simply been no need to.
It is all so easy here in this actual world’.

In other words, if the situation and circumstances were such as to render it an eminently sensible course of action, I would have no hesitation whatsoever in cheerfully, and thus convincingly, lying through my back teeth (to use a colloquialism). (Actual Freedom Mailing List, No. 111, 3 May 2006).

The very fact you seek to impose real-world morality – where such rules of conduct are an obvious requisite (else all cultures in all ages would not have imposed them) in order to control the savage beast which lurks within every ‘human’ breast – upon the inhabitants of Terra Actualis provides clear evidence of the presence of ‘self’ lurking in the depths of your psyche despite your many attempts to pretend otherwise over the years.

In a word: sprung.

In regards to the topic you so gullibly bought into I will first draw attention to the following – before throwing some light upon the further above discussion (which was proceeding quite famously before your tergiversatory entree) – so as to be able to set the scene in my own terms of reference.


From: richard.actualfreedom
Date: Mon Jun 3, 2013 2:34 am

• [Justine]: 2) Also delete the portions you say [female identifier words withheld] became actually free overnight, just on meeting you in person, because she has requested me to delete it.
• [Respondent No. 37]: Justine, it would be great if [female identifier words withheld] could present her story here.

• [Richard]: So that you know just what it is that [quote] ‘would be great’ [endquote] for you (as in, ‘grist for your mill’, to use a well-known expression) I will make it unequivocally clear here and now that nowhere on The Actual Freedom Trust website does the name of [female identifier words withheld] appear. Nor also, for that matter, do the words ‘[female identifier words withheld]’ feature anywhere. In fact, there is no reference anywhere at all to even indicate (i.e., infer from) that anybody with any kind of [connection identifier words withheld] connection whatsoever with Justine has had any kind of in-person interaction with me.
Just to be absolutely clear: there are no such portions as are averred to by Justine – as in his [quote] ‘the portions you say [female identifier words withheld] became actually free’ [endquote] words further above – for me to delete.
(Unlike more than a few peoples – those still needing morals and ethics to control their behaviour and actions – having due regard for others’ personal security/ physical privacy comes as a matter-of-course for me).

A couple of hours before midnight on the 19th of October 2011 an Australian citizen of Indian birth and upbringing flew into Coolangatta Airport, on a domestic flight from another city several hours away where she has her residence, upon a prearranged agreement to meet in person so as to not only talk about her life and to gain clarity in her life-style/her livelihood situation but, primarily and above all else, to [quote] ‘get into Peace and Harmony where Richard is’ [endquote].

Less than 24 hours after landing she was actually free of blind nature’s instinctual passions/the feeling-being formed thereof.

From that moment on, during each day thereafter for the rest of her seven-day visit, she consistently (and happily) reported living the ‘peace-on-earth’ actual freedom – as per the reports on The Actual Freedom Trust website – no matter what type of test she subjected her pure consciousness experiencing to (various everyday situations and circumstances, such as would previously precipitate/ perpetuate an intense inner anguish, for instance, including a long-distance telephonic communication with her progenitress in which ensued not a trace of the usual/ typical inculpatory and/or recriminatory outcomes).

On the fifth day of her visit, around noon, she initiated a brief discussion on the topic of truthfulness and falsehood – always a hot topic for those new to the actual world (be it either a PCE or actual freedom) – and I not only referred her to that further above May 03 2006 post of mine I made a point of reading it out aloud to her, there and then, as it is entirely self-explanatory.

The conversation proceeded swimmingly thereafter.


This particular topic – and other topics of similar ilk – have all been raised before, and are archived on The Actual Freedom Trust website where they are freely available (at no cost whatsoever) for anyone to peruse.

For instance:

• [Co-Respondent]: (...) what happens where there is great disturbance, discomfort, where you are put out by others, your car is smashed, you are in pain, and you are on your way to the emergency room where the facilities are still poorly maintained, equipped and staffed. Is your world still serene and cheerful?

• [Richard]: Yes, the clean and clear and pure perfection of peace-on-earth never goes away. There is a preference for the creature-comforts, of course, but one takes the world of people, things and events as it is. Even if every single human being was happy and harmless, there would still be cyclones and earthquakes and tidal waves and fires and crocodiles and sharks and mosquitoes and so forth.
Life is an adventure, after all.
Every day is like this in this actual world, although I can occasionally meet unhelpful people, unhappy people, even rude people ... the entire gamut of human expression.
I can easily make allowances for them for I know that they all live in reality ... and life can be a grim and glum business there.
Here, all is benevolent, friendly and kind; no perversity has ever existed in actual freedom.
There is a marked absence of malice here in this actual world; evil has no foothold, no being anywhere at all.

• [Co-Respondent]: You do not have it, but you are therefore pushed, you are taken advantage of, now what happens psychologically, how do you react?

• [Richard]: Unlike in enlightenment, pacifism plays no part here. Being free of sorrow and malice – not having merely transcended them and sugar-coated ‘me’ with Love and Compassion and Beauty and Truth – if someone bops me on the nose, I am free to bop them back with a liberated impunity. (List B, No. 20a, Pacifism).

In short, you are on a hiding to nowhere, and fast, trying to impose real-world standards – where they are an absolute necessity due to the aforementioned wayward ‘self’ – on the peoples populating Terra Actualis (where nothing ‘dirty’, so to speak, can get in and/or gain a foothold).

For here all is immaculate perfection.

Regards, Richard.


P.S.: Incidentally, the sentence which started all this – with [No. 25] saying he thought it a very strange thing for me to ask him, when he was here previously, ‘what would be the point in flying halfway around the world only to fly back the same person you were before you left when it is so dead easy to become (newly) free’ (whilst interacting intensively with the only two fully free persons on the planet) – is in itself worthy of a comment, en passant, as he thinks my consoling words, just prior to his departure, have in some way or another rendered that initial observation of mine ‘bizarre’.

Perhaps an analogy will illustrate: a person makes an appointment with the owner-manager of an opulent Rolls Royce dealership, in top end of town, whereupon, after making urbane acquaintance, he has all the virtues of the latest and most state-of-the-art luxury limousine ever to grace the lushly carpeted floors of that august establishment reported/ described/ explained to him in meticulous detail only to say, upon having a gracious invitation extended to him to personally take the wheel for a climate-controlled test-run, that what he really has in mind is a Datsun Bluebird 311 ... to be purchased on a lay-by instalment plan over an indefinite period.

And in vain doth the owner-manager freely proffer his priceless, top-of-the-line luxury limousine – which is, verily, immaculate perfection on four wheels – complete with its conveyance transaction to be enacted in an instant (and at no monetary cost whatsoever) as the person concerned is adamant in regards the Datsun Bluebird 311, and its indefinite-period lay-by instalment plan, because a friend, a friend with a history, has convinced him that the owner-manager is a ... um ... a ‘lunatic cunt’.

Hence the word ‘bizarre’ in that sentence which started all this.



The Third Alternative

(Peace On Earth In This Life Time As This Flesh And Blood Body)

Here is an actual freedom from the Human Condition, surpassing Spiritual Enlightenment and any other Altered State Of Consciousness, and challenging all philosophy, psychiatry, metaphysics (including quantum physics with its mystic cosmogony), anthropology, sociology ... and any religion along with its paranormal theology. Discarding all of the beliefs that have held humankind in thralldom for aeons, the way has now been discovered that cuts through the ‘Tried and True’ and enables anyone to be, for the first time, a fully free and autonomous individual living in utter peace and tranquillity, beholden to no-one.

Richard’s Text ©The Actual Freedom Trust: 1997-.  All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer and Use Restrictions and Guarantee of Authenticity